Include CRC32 in benchmarks on website #1050

Open
opened 2025-06-23 09:35:01 -05:00 by tansy · 1 comment
tansy commented 2025-06-23 09:35:01 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Looking at benchmarks table on main website I noticed lack off most popular check sum on internet, namely CRC32. Although it's not a hash but checksum but 'bandwidth speed' in this table refers to hashes being used add check sums, hence proposition to include CRC.

Here is improvised patch with it.

Also, suggetion to a bench - every test should anounce units it uses, as these numbers don't mean much, if anything, without it.

benchmarking large inputs : from 512 bytes (log9) to 128 MB (log27) [MB/s]:
Throughput small inputs of fixed size (from 1 to 30 bytes) [#/s]:
benchmarking random size inputs [1-N] ???:
Looking at benchmarks table on main website I noticed lack off most popular check sum on internet, namely CRC32. Although it's not a hash but checksum but 'bandwidth speed' in this table refers to hashes being used add check sums, hence proposition to include CRC. [Here](https://paste.ee/p/qUxbgCIc) is improvised patch with it. Also, suggetion to a bench - every test should anounce units it uses, as these numbers don't mean much, if anything, without it. ~~~ benchmarking large inputs : from 512 bytes (log9) to 128 MB (log27) [MB/s]: Throughput small inputs of fixed size (from 1 to 30 bytes) [#/s]: benchmarking random size inputs [1-N] ???: ~~~
gtnardy commented 2025-10-20 10:22:20 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

this would be a really good comparison

this would be a really good comparison
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-Cyan4973/xxHash#1050
No description provided.