Address issue 938 by choosing a FIPS compliant implementation #939

Closed
SteveGilham wants to merge 2 commits from develop/issue-938 into master
SteveGilham commented 2024-03-23 08:25:16 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Replacing use of SHA1Managed with the compliant SHA1CryptoServiceProvider implementation.

Also, as a convenience, adding RollForward Major to the test projects so they will run on a machine with only net60 and up installed.

Replacing use of `SHA1Managed` with the compliant `SHA1CryptoServiceProvider` implementation. Also, as a convenience, adding RollForward Major to the test projects so they will run on a machine with only net60 and up installed.
jbevain commented 2024-05-20 21:46:02 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Thanks, I've fixed it in #944!

Thanks, I've fixed it in #944!

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-jbevain/cecil!939
No description provided.