gh-libusb/hidapi
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked hidapi
 0
Code Issues 58 Pull requests 18 Releases 13 Wiki Activity

Test matrix for hidapi release #376

New issue
Closed
opened 2022-02-05 21:31:41 -06:00 by mcuee · 11 comments
mcuee commented 2022-02-05 21:31:41 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

It seems to me it is a good idea to have the test matrix, similar to the following for libusb-1.0.25rc1.

It seems to me it is a good idea to have the test matrix, similar to the following for libusb-1.0.25rc1. * https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/1046
mcuee commented 2022-02-08 21:06:08 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

macports seem to provide a good one for macOS support.
Ref: https://ports.macports.org/port/hidapi/details/

From here for HIDAPI Version: 0.11.2
https://ports.macports.org/port/hidapi/details/

  • Monterey (arm64)
  • Monterey (x86_64)
  • Big Sur (arm64)
  • Big Sur (x86_64)
  • Catalina
  • Mojave
  • High Sierra
  • Sierra
  • El Capitan
  • Yosemite
  • Mavericks
  • Mountain Lion
  • Lion
  • Snow Leopard (x86_64)
  • Snow Leopard (i386)
  • Leopard (ppc legacy) -->???
macports seem to provide a good one for macOS support. Ref: https://ports.macports.org/port/hidapi/details/ From here for HIDAPI Version: 0.11.2 https://ports.macports.org/port/hidapi/details/ - [x] Monterey (arm64) - [x] Monterey (x86_64) - [x] Big Sur (arm64) - [x] Big Sur (x86_64) - [x] Catalina - [x] Mojave - [x] High Sierra - [x] Sierra - [x] El Capitan - [x] Yosemite - [x] Mavericks - [x] Mountain Lion - [x] Lion - [x] Snow Leopard (x86_64) - [x] Snow Leopard (i386) - [ ] Leopard (ppc legacy) -->???
Youw commented 2022-02-09 06:29:12 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

A question here - what do we test by this?
If just to verify that it builds - Github Actions / Appveyor / builds.sr.ht is an indication as well.

A question here - what do we test by this? If just to verify that it builds - Github Actions / Appveyor / builds.sr.ht is an indication as well.
mcuee commented 2022-02-09 06:56:03 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The idea is not only to carry out build test, but also test with a few real devices (USB/Bluetooth) using hidtest (hidapitester is another good one) and other applications dependant on hidapi.

Ref: similar discussion in libusb

It will be good to document some known good devices to carry out the tests.

The idea is not only to carry out build test, but also test with a few real devices (USB/Bluetooth) using hidtest (hidapitester is another good one) and other applications dependant on hidapi. Ref: similar discussion in libusb * https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/1052 It will be good to document some known good devices to carry out the tests.
mcuee commented 2022-02-09 07:07:18 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The other thing is to see the operating systems the contributors are able to test: eg: Windows versions, macOS versions, Linux and FreeBSD.

For example, does it make sense to still support Windows XP and Vista? Or old macOS versions? Or very old Linux versions?

The other thing is to see the operating systems the contributors are able to test: eg: Windows versions, macOS versions, Linux and FreeBSD. For example, does it make sense to still support Windows XP and Vista? Or old macOS versions? Or very old Linux versions?
Youw commented 2022-02-09 07:23:00 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

does it make sense to still support Windows XP and Vista? Or old macOS versions? Or very old Linux versions?

For as long as it doesn't require the actually effort / workarounds on a code level to support those.

> does it make sense to still support Windows XP and Vista? Or old macOS versions? Or very old Linux versions? For as long as it doesn't require the actually effort / workarounds on a code level to support those.
👍 1
Youw commented 2022-05-02 06:36:14 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I'm ready to release a v0.12.0.

How do we want to proceed with the test matrix for it?

I'm ready to release a `v0.12.0`. How do we want to proceed with the test matrix for it?
mcuee commented 2022-05-02 20:51:48 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@Youw I am okay with either of the following.

  1. Just release v0.12.0 as it is. Right now I tend to think hidapi is rather stable so this is an okay option.

  2. Release 0.12.0rc1 first and then wait for two weeks to release v0.12.0 so that people can test hidapi on different operating systems and different devices to see if there are regressions. It would also be good to check the major language bindinges (eg: cython-hidapi and node-hid).

@Youw I am okay with either of the following. 1) Just release v0.12.0 as it is. Right now I tend to think hidapi is rather stable so this is an okay option. 2) Release 0.12.0rc1 first and then wait for two weeks to release v0.12.0 so that people can test hidapi on different operating systems and different devices to see if there are regressions. It would also be good to check the major language bindinges (eg: cython-hidapi and node-hid).
mcuee commented 2022-05-02 21:01:03 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Reference: libusb 1.0.26-rc1 test matrix

If we go with this idea I should be able to test under the following system. I will use CMake on most of the systems. Then I will also test the VS solution using VS2019.

macOS 12 ARM64 (mac Mini M1)

  • build: Apple clang
  • run: hidtest and hidapitester

macOS 12 x86_64 using Rosetta Translation, not native (mac Mini M1)

  • build: Apple clang
  • run: hidtest and hidapitester

Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 20.04)

  • build: gcc 9.4
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Linux ARM32 (Raspberry Pi 400 running Raspberry Pi OS Bullseye 32 bit)

  • build: gcc
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Linux ARM64 (Raspberry Pi 400 running Raspberry Pi OS Bullseye 64 bit)

  • build: gcc
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Windows VS2019 64 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop)

  • build:
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Windows VS2019 32 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop)

  • build:
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Windows MinGW 64 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop)

  • build: MSYS2 MinGW-w64 64bit GCC
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester

Windows MinGW 32 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop)

  • build: MinGW-w64 32 bit GCC
  • run: hidtest and hidaptester
Reference: libusb 1.0.26-rc1 test matrix * https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/1099 If we go with this idea I should be able to test under the following system. I will use CMake on most of the systems. Then I will also test the VS solution using VS2019. ### macOS 12 ARM64 (mac Mini M1) - [ ] build: Apple clang - [ ] run: hidtest and hidapitester ### macOS 12 x86_64 using Rosetta Translation, not native (mac Mini M1) - [ ] build: Apple clang - [ ] run: hidtest and hidapitester ### Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu 20.04) - [ ] build: gcc 9.4 - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Linux ARM32 (Raspberry Pi 400 running Raspberry Pi OS Bullseye 32 bit) - [ ] build: gcc - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Linux ARM64 (Raspberry Pi 400 running Raspberry Pi OS Bullseye 64 bit) - [ ] build: gcc - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Windows VS2019 64 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop) - [ ] build: - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Windows VS2019 32 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop) - [ ] build: - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Windows MinGW 64 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop) - [ ] build: MSYS2 MinGW-w64 64bit GCC - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester ### Windows MinGW 32 bit (Windows 11 x64 laptop) - [ ] build: MinGW-w64 32 bit GCC - [ ] run: hidtest and hidaptester
mcuee commented 2022-05-02 21:07:34 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I can not test macOS Intel but I am sure there are people who can test it. Same for FreeBSD.

Then I am probably not good at testing cython-hidapi and node-hid but again other people can test. I will try to test them as well.

I can not test macOS Intel but I am sure there are people who can test it. Same for FreeBSD. Then I am probably not good at testing cython-hidapi and node-hid but again other people can test. I will try to test them as well.
Youw commented 2022-05-03 04:35:15 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

https://github.com/libusb/hidapi/issues/407

https://github.com/libusb/hidapi/issues/407
👍 1
mcuee commented 2022-05-03 20:57:42 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Close this as #407 has been raised.

Close this as #407 has been raised. * #407
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
read-interrupt
connection-callback-2
hotplug-async-enumerate-libusb
hotplug-tests-integration
hotplug-async-enumerate-mac
hotplug-tests
hotplug-async-enumerate-windows
hotplug-async-enumerate-linux
hotplug-docs-consistency
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/falkTX/linux-dynamic-libudev
gh-pages
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/aokblast/use_hid_raw
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/sudobash1/libusb_input_size
hotplug-integration
connection-callback
read-interrupt-win-test
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/auxcorelabs/feature/input-report-buffer-size
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/FrameworkComputer/hid-firmware-ver
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/slouken/0001-hidapi-linux-retry-hid_send_feature_report-if-the-io.patch
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/slouken/0001-hidapi-libusb-maintain-in-memory-cache-of-vendor-pro.patch
archive/20260923T145431Z-rescue/slouken/0001-hidapi-windows-fixed-PS4-controllers-over-Bluetooth-.patch
winrt
hidapi-0.15.0
hidapi-0.14.0
hidapi-0.13.1
hidapi-0.13.0
hidapi-0.12.0
hidapi-0.12.0-rc2
hidapi-0.12.0-rc1
hidapi-0.11.2
hidapi-0.11.1
hidapi-0.11.0
cmake-support-deprecated
libusb_wrap_device-deprecated
hidapi-0.10.1
hidapi-0.10.0
hidapi-0.9.0
hidapi-0.9.0-rc1
hidapi-0.8.0-rc1
hidapi-0.7.0
hidapi-0.6.0
hidapi-0.5.2
hidapi-0.5.1
hidapi-0.5.0
hidapi-0.3.0
hidapi-0.2.4
hidapi-0.2.3
hidapi-0.2.2
hidapi-0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels   
3rdparty
3rd-party related issue/question

  
Android
Android OS related

  
API
API change, Version 1 stuff

  
Author does not respond

   
bsd
FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, etc

  
bug
Something isn't working

  
build system/CI
Anything related to building the project or running on CI

  
ci-virtual-device
Run the virtual HID device CI jobs (Windows driver + libusb raw-gadget)

  
CMake
Related to CMake build system

  
Contributions Welcome
Any external help is welcome

  
Core
Related to common codes like hidapi.h

  
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file

  
device-specific
Issues/PRs related to a specific device

  
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation

  
don't_merge
Don't merge this PR as is

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature or request

  
Example
Related to hidtest or new examples

  
Haiku
Related to Haiku OS (using libusb backend)

  
hidraw
Related to Linux/hidraw backend

  
hotplug
Related to hotplug

  
info required
Need more input from PR/issue author

  
invalid
Not a HIDAPI issue

  
libusb
Related to libusb backend

  
macOS
Related to macOS backend

  
Misc
Typo, whitespace, etc.

  
Not an issue

   
question
Information is requested

  
Release
Related to new release

  
Test
Related to built-in test (not hidtest)

  
Test GUI
Related to a Test GUI application

  
Windows
Related to Windows backend

  
wontfix
This will not be worked on

No labels
3rdparty
Android
API
Author does not respond
bsd
bug
build system/CI
ci-virtual-device
CMake
Contributions Welcome
Core
dependencies
device-specific
documentation
don't_merge
duplicate
enhancement
Example
Haiku
hidraw
hotplug
info required
invalid
libusb
macOS
Misc
Not an issue
question
Release
Test
Test GUI
Windows
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-libusb/hidapi#376
No description provided.