Unsafe implemention of hal_flash_bank_t in pico_btstack #1406

Closed
opened 2023-05-31 03:24:20 -05:00 by geurtv · 2 comments
geurtv commented 2023-05-31 03:24:20 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

As far as I can tell the current implementation of hal_flash_bank_t in pico_btstack is unsafe if both rp2040 cores are enabled, because the other core isn't locked-out during flash erase and program, correct? See Detailed Description at hardware_flash.

As far as I can tell the current implementation of hal_flash_bank_t in pico_btstack is unsafe if both rp2040 cores are enabled, because the other core isn't locked-out during flash erase and program, correct? See Detailed Description at [hardware_flash](https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/pico-sdk/hardware.html#hardware_flash).
kilograham commented 2023-05-31 09:34:11 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

yup; i had assigned #1293 to myself to fix this as part of that.

yup; i had assigned #1293 to myself to fix this as part of that.
kilograham commented 2023-06-06 11:24:23 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

#1412 merged into develop

#1412 merged into develop
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-raspberrypi/pico-sdk#1406
No description provided.