gh-Mbed-TLS/mbedtls-framework
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked mbedtls-framework
 0
Code Issues 39 Pull requests 42 Releases Activity

fix: correct spelling of received in log messages #230

Open
TakutoYamane wants to merge 1 commit from TakutoYamane/fix-typo into main
pull from: TakutoYamane/fix-typo
merge into: gh-Mbed-TLS:main
Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files changed 3 +3 -3
TakutoYamane commented 2025-10-23 20:39:32 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description

Fix misspelling of "receive".

Needs preceding PR: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/issues/10487 because the files currently in this repository are not up to date.

PR checklist

Please add the numbers (or links) of the associated pull requests for consuming branches. You can omit branches where this pull request is not needed.

  • TF-PSA-Crypto PR not required because: no changes
  • development PR not required because: no changes
  • 3.6 PR not required because: no changes
## Description Fix misspelling of "receive". Needs preceding PR: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/issues/10487 because the files currently in this repository are not up to date. ## PR checklist Please add the numbers (or links) of the associated pull requests for consuming branches. You can omit branches where this pull request is not needed. - [x] **TF-PSA-Crypto PR** not required because: no changes - [x] **development PR** not required because: no changes - [x] **3.6 PR** not required because: no changes
gilles-peskine-arm (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2025-10-30 04:24:54 -05:00
gilles-peskine-arm (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

LGTM

LGTM
valeriosetti (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2025-10-31 07:36:43 -05:00
valeriosetti commented 2025-10-31 08:43:28 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The fix is OK, but I added the do-not-merge label because this not the real psasim implementation that we're using in our CI. The correct one is located here in the mbedtls repo. The plan is to move it from mbedtls to the framework so this fix needs to be re-evaluated after this change.

The fix is OK, but I added the `do-not-merge` label because this not the real `psasim` implementation that we're using in our CI. The correct one is located [here](https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/tree/development/tests/psa-client-server/psasim) in the `mbedtls` repo. The [plan is to move it](https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/issues/10487) from `mbedtls` to the `framework` so this fix needs to be re-evaluated after this change.
This pull request has changes conflicting with the target branch.
  • psasim/src/client.c
  • psasim/test/client.c
  • psasim/test/server.c
View command line instructions

Manual merge helper

Use this merge commit message when completing the merge manually.

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo:TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'

Merge

Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.

Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.

git switch 'main'
git merge --no-ff 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git rebase 'main'
git switch 'main'
git merge --ff-only 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git rebase 'main'
git switch 'main'
git merge --no-ff 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'main'
git merge --squash 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'main'
git merge --ff-only 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git switch 'main'
git merge 'TakutoYamane/fix-typo'
git push origin 'main'
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
gilles-peskine-arm
valeriosetti
Labels
Clear labels   
approved
Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports

  
bug
Something isn't working

  
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file

  
DO-NOT-MERGE

   
enhancement
New feature or request

  
good-first-issue
Good for newcomers

  
help-wanted
This issue is not being actively worked on, but PRs welcome.

  
historical-reviewed
Reviewed & agreed to keep legacy PR/issue

  
historical-reviewing
Currently reviewing (for legacy PR/issues)

  
needs-adoption
stalled PR that someone should pick up and complete

  
needs-ci
Needs to pass CI tests

  
needs-design-approval

   
needs-info
An issue or PR which needs further info from the reporter / author

  
needs-preceding-pr
Requires another PR to be merged first

  
needs-review
Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members.

  
needs-reviewer
This PR needs someone to pick it up for review

  
needs-work

   
priority-high
High priority - will be reviewed soon

  
priority-low
Low priority - this may not receive review soon

  
priority-medium
Medium priority - this can be reviewed as time permits

  
priority-scheduled
This PR is big - it will require time to be scheduled for review

  
priority-very-high
Highest priority - prioritise this over other review work

  
single-reviewer
This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer

  
size-l
Estimated task size: large (2w+)

  
size-m
Estimated task size: medium (~1w)

  
size-s
Estimated task size: small (~2d)

  
size-xs
Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most)

No labels
approved
bug
dependencies
DO-NOT-MERGE
enhancement
good-first-issue
help-wanted
historical-reviewed
historical-reviewing
needs-adoption
needs-ci
needs-design-approval
needs-info
needs-preceding-pr
needs-review
needs-reviewer
needs-work
priority-high
priority-low
priority-medium
priority-scheduled
priority-very-high
single-reviewer
size-l
size-m
size-s
size-xs
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-Mbed-TLS/mbedtls-framework!230
No description provided.