gh-Mbed-TLS/mbedtls-framework
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked mbedtls-framework
 0
Code Issues 39 Pull requests 42 Releases Activity

Update test functions with spake2+ related definitions #323

Open
Thomasdjb wants to merge 1 commit from Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export into main
pull from: Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export
merge into: gh-Mbed-TLS:main
Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +2
Thomasdjb commented 2026-09-25 10:24:57 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description

Update test function generation with the new SPAKE2+ required definitions.

TF-PSA-Crypto PR: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/817

PR checklist

Please add the numbers (or links) of the associated pull requests for consuming branches. You can omit branches where this pull request is not needed.

  • TF-PSA-Crypto development PR provided: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/817
  • TF-PSA-Crypto 1.1 PR provided # | not required because:
  • mbedtls development PR provided # | not required because:
  • mbedtls 4.1 PR provided # | not required because:
  • mbedtls 3.6 PR provided # | not required because:

Notes for the submitter

Please refer to the contributing guidelines, especially the
checklist for PR contributors.

Help make review efficient:

  • Multiple simple commits
    • please structure your PR into a series of small commits, each of which does one thing
  • Avoid force-push
    • please do not force-push to update your PR - just add new commit(s)
  • See our Guidelines for Contributors for more details about the review process.
## Description Update test function generation with the new SPAKE2+ required definitions. TF-PSA-Crypto PR: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/817 ## PR checklist Please add the numbers (or links) of the associated pull requests for consuming branches. You can omit branches where this pull request is not needed. - [x] **TF-PSA-Crypto development PR** provided: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/TF-PSA-Crypto/pull/817 - [ ] **TF-PSA-Crypto 1.1 PR** provided # | not required because: - [ ] **mbedtls development PR** provided # | not required because: - [ ] **mbedtls 4.1 PR** provided # | not required because: - [ ] **mbedtls 3.6 PR** provided # | not required because: ## Notes for the submitter Please refer to the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/blob/development/CONTRIBUTING.md), especially the checklist for PR contributors. Help make review efficient: * Multiple simple commits - please structure your PR into a series of small commits, each of which does one thing * Avoid force-push - please do not force-push to update your PR - just add new commit(s) * See our [Guidelines for Contributors](https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviews/review-for-contributors/) for more details about the review process.
mpg commented 2026-09-28 02:18:44 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

TF-PSA-Crypto development PR provided # | not required because:

Please actually remove "not required because" and fill in the PR number.

Also, please do not check the boxes yourself, and leave that to a gatekeeper or trusted reviewer. (see below)

> **TF-PSA-Crypto development PR** provided # | not required because: Please actually remove "not required because" and fill in the PR number. ~Also, please do not check the boxes yourself, and leave that to a gatekeeper or trusted reviewer.~ (see below)
👍 1
mpg commented 2026-09-28 03:40:11 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Also, please do not check the boxes yourself, and leave that to a gatekeeper or trusted reviewer.

Sorry, that was an overreaction, let me correct: please only check a box if (1) you have actually edited this line with relevant info and (2) you are reasonably confident about it. If unsure, leave the box unchecked and ask (eg "I'm not sure about the need for a changelog entry / backport because ....").

> Also, please do not check the boxes yourself, and leave that to a gatekeeper or trusted reviewer. Sorry, that was an overreaction, let me correct: please only check a box if (1) you have actually edited this line with relevant info and (2) you are reasonably confident about it. If unsure, leave the box unchecked and ask (eg "I'm not sure about the need for a changelog entry / backport because ....").
👍 1
This pull request is broken due to missing fork information.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export:Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'

Merge

Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.

Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.

git switch 'main'
git merge --no-ff 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git rebase 'main'
git switch 'main'
git merge --ff-only 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git rebase 'main'
git switch 'main'
git merge --no-ff 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'main'
git merge --squash 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'main'
git merge --ff-only 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git switch 'main'
git merge 'Thomasdjb/pr/spake2p-9342-public-key-import-export'
git push origin 'main'
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
approved
Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports

  
bug
Something isn't working

  
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file

  
DO-NOT-MERGE

   
enhancement
New feature or request

  
good-first-issue
Good for newcomers

  
help-wanted
This issue is not being actively worked on, but PRs welcome.

  
historical-reviewed
Reviewed & agreed to keep legacy PR/issue

  
historical-reviewing
Currently reviewing (for legacy PR/issues)

  
needs-adoption
stalled PR that someone should pick up and complete

  
needs-ci
Needs to pass CI tests

  
needs-design-approval

   
needs-info
An issue or PR which needs further info from the reporter / author

  
needs-preceding-pr
Requires another PR to be merged first

  
needs-review
Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members.

  
needs-reviewer
This PR needs someone to pick it up for review

  
needs-work

   
priority-high
High priority - will be reviewed soon

  
priority-low
Low priority - this may not receive review soon

  
priority-medium
Medium priority - this can be reviewed as time permits

  
priority-scheduled
This PR is big - it will require time to be scheduled for review

  
priority-very-high
Highest priority - prioritise this over other review work

  
single-reviewer
This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer

  
size-l
Estimated task size: large (2w+)

  
size-m
Estimated task size: medium (~1w)

  
size-s
Estimated task size: small (~2d)

  
size-xs
Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most)

No labels
approved
bug
dependencies
DO-NOT-MERGE
enhancement
good-first-issue
help-wanted
historical-reviewed
historical-reviewing
needs-adoption
needs-ci
needs-design-approval
needs-info
needs-preceding-pr
needs-review
needs-reviewer
needs-work
priority-high
priority-low
priority-medium
priority-scheduled
priority-very-high
single-reviewer
size-l
size-m
size-s
size-xs
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
gh-Mbed-TLS/mbedtls-framework!323
No description provided.