Adding missing #[inline] #136

Merged

Amanieu merged 1 commit from missing_inline into master 2017-11-12 09:57:40 -06:00

Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +4

Amanieu commented 2017-11-12 09:41:33 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

• Copy link
• Copy Markdown

There are a few places that are missing #[inline]. This causes all() to produce inefficient code at runtime when the bitflags are defined in a separate crate.

There are a few places that are missing `#[inline]`. This causes `all()` to produce inefficient code at runtime when the bitflags are defined in a separate crate.

dtolnay (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2017-11-12 09:57:36 -06:00

dtolnay (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

• Copy link
• Copy Markdown

Thanks!

Thanks!

dtolnay commented 2017-11-12 10:05:13 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

• Copy link
• Copy Markdown

I published this in 1.0.1.

I published this in 1.0.1.

Amanieu commented 2017-11-12 10:05:51 -06:00 (Migrated from github.com)

• Copy link
• Copy Markdown

Thanks!

Thanks!

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No reviewers

dtolnay

Labels

Clear labels   

bug

  

good first issue

No labels

bug

good first issue

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference

gh-bitflags/bitflags!136

No description provided.