Enable hardware_irq library also in host and not only in rp2_common (#2595) #2596
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bazel
bluetooth
board settings
boot_stage2
bug
build
c++
can't reproduce
clang
clib-interface
cmsis
code cleanliness
code size
compiler version issues
cyw43_driver
debug
discussion
documentation
duplicate
dynamic_clock
elf2uf2
enhancement
errata
filesystem
flash layout
floating point
FreeRTOS
hardware_adc
hardware_claim
hardware_clocks
hardware_dma
hardware_exception
hardware_flash
hardware_gpio
hardware_i2c
hardware_irq
hardware_pio
hardware_pwm
hardware_rcp
hardware_rtc
hardware_spi
hardware_sync
hardware_uart
hardware_vreg
hardware_watchdog
hardware_xosc
help wanted
host
IAR
installation
invalid
linker scripts
lto
lwip
mbedtls
missing API
needs reporter detail
networking
newlib
newlib-multicore
non-c
non-cmake
non-gcc
openocd
orphan PR
OS integration
pico_async_context
pico_base
pico_binary_info
pico_flash
picolibc
pico_lwip
pico_malloc
pico_multicore
pico_printf
pico_runtime
pico_stdio
pico_stdio_usb
pico_sync
pico_time
pico_util
pioasm
port
question
review
review2
rtos interop
runtime init
static library
svd
test
tinyusb
vscode
wifi integration
wontfix
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
gh-raspberrypi/pico-sdk!2596
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "hardware_irq_hardware_claim_host"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The "host" folder already contains "hardware_irq" source code.
The "common" folder already contains "hardware_claim" source code.
For testing purposes, it could be useful to enable hardware_irq and hardware_claim build by default also in PICO_PLATFORM=host.
I'm assuming this change wasn't supposed to be in this PR?
Correct, it shouldn't have been a Pull Request.
I removed it.
Need to integrate also Bazel build.fixes #2595