Use 'constexpr' when including pio header files from a C++ compiler #2651
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bazel
bluetooth
board settings
boot_stage2
bug
build
c++
can't reproduce
clang
clib-interface
cmsis
code cleanliness
code size
compiler version issues
cyw43_driver
debug
discussion
documentation
duplicate
dynamic_clock
elf2uf2
enhancement
errata
filesystem
flash layout
floating point
FreeRTOS
hardware_adc
hardware_claim
hardware_clocks
hardware_dma
hardware_exception
hardware_flash
hardware_gpio
hardware_i2c
hardware_irq
hardware_pio
hardware_pwm
hardware_rcp
hardware_rtc
hardware_spi
hardware_sync
hardware_uart
hardware_vreg
hardware_watchdog
hardware_xosc
help wanted
host
IAR
installation
invalid
linker scripts
lto
lwip
mbedtls
missing API
needs reporter detail
networking
newlib
newlib-multicore
non-c
non-cmake
non-gcc
openocd
orphan PR
OS integration
pico_async_context
pico_base
pico_binary_info
pico_flash
picolibc
pico_lwip
pico_malloc
pico_multicore
pico_printf
pico_runtime
pico_stdio
pico_stdio_usb
pico_sync
pico_time
pico_util
pioasm
port
question
review
review2
rtos interop
runtime init
static library
svd
test
tinyusb
vscode
wifi integration
wontfix
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
gh-raspberrypi/pico-sdk!2651
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "develop"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
In particular this allows compile-time checks to be performed on the contents of pio_program structs via 'static_assert'.
This could be used (for example) to confirm that multiple PIO programs fit in a single PIO module and abort compilation if not.
Fixes #2650
@ -79,6 +79,13 @@ struct c_sdk_output : public output_format {fprintf(out, "#endif\n");https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constexpr.html says that
constexprwas only added in C++11, so should this line perhaps beso that it doesn't break older C++ compilers? (Or perhaps simply
#ifdef __cpp_constexpris sufficient?)@ -79,6 +79,13 @@ struct c_sdk_output : public output_format {fprintf(out, "#endif\n");Yes, fair point. I've update the check.